Notification
Mycryptopot
  • Home
  • News
  • Crypto
    • Altcoins
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • Cardano
    • Ethereum
    • Nft
    • Solana
    • XRP
    • Tron
  • MarketCap
  • Market
  • Forex
  • Mining
  • Metaverse
  • Exchange
  • Regulations
  • Analysis
    • Crypto Bubbles
    • Multi Currency
    • Evaluation
Reading: This User Just Paid $700,402 as Ethereum Transaction Fees to Send Nothing
Share
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 75,696.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,232.07
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.998954
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 694.71
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999491
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.16
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.998709
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.071332
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.180927
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 89.18
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 0.891361
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.320031
MycryptopotMycryptopot
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Crypto
    • Altcoins
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • Cardano
    • Ethereum
    • Nft
    • Solana
    • XRP
    • Tron
  • MarketCap
  • Market
  • Forex
  • Mining
  • Metaverse
  • Exchange
  • Regulations
  • Analysis
    • Crypto Bubbles
    • Multi Currency
    • Evaluation
© 2024 All Rights reserved | Powered by Crypto My Crypto Pot
Mycryptopot > News > Crypto > Ethereum > This User Just Paid $700,402 as Ethereum Transaction Fees to Send Nothing
Ethereum

This User Just Paid $700,402 as Ethereum Transaction Fees to Send Nothing

October 14, 2024 4 Min Read
Share
This User Just Paid $700,402 as Ethereum Transaction Fees to Send Nothing

A pockets spent 288 ETH as transaction charges and ended up sending nothing, triggering widespread reactions within the crypto group.

In right this moment’s Ethereum information, one other enormous transaction charge was paid on the Ethereum community. In keeping with blockchain transaction tracker Whale Alert, a person paid a staggering 288 ETH for a single transaction.

One of the vital fascinating developments across the transaction, moreover its magnanimous transaction charge, was that the person ended up transferring nothing to the receiving tackle. Per Etherscan, the pockets tackle despatched 0 ETH to the receiving tackle, whereas paying 288 ETH as charge.

Notably, the 288 ETH transaction charge was value $700,402 on the time of writing, with Ether buying and selling at $2,429 per coin. Knowledge from Etherscan exhibits that the transaction occurred right this moment at 4:22 AM UTC.

Fats Finger?

The explanations behind the substantial transaction charge stay unknown at press time. Nevertheless, the character of the transaction appeared like a fats finger.

For context, a fats finger refers to an unintended or clumsy enter of figures, leading to extreme numbers being typed. An error equivalent to this might end in community members inputting the figures meant for the transaction measurement part within the transaction charge part.

Notably, after the misguided transaction, the pockets tackle concerned made one other switch. This time, it paid a charge of $0.1 to switch 96 ETH to MevRefund, a white hat hacker and on-chain researcher. This subsequent switch additional bolstered hypothesis across the fats finger principle.

Nevertheless, MevRefund flagged the sending tackle within the transaction as a compromised pockets. In a tweet, MevRefund insinuated that the hacker deliberately paid the outrageous transaction charges, seeing that the tackle to which he was sending the stolen funds had been feezed.

Hello @stakefish , I am serving to whitehat a compromised withdrawal tackle.

Sadly, it appears that evidently if the dangerous guys cannot have it, no one can 😢

Any probability you’ll be able to return these stolen funds to the rightful proprietor?https://t.co/4TPQ4U6vuG pic.twitter.com/PA5CxbXayH

— MevRefund (@MevRefund) October 8, 2024

Different Enormous Transaction Charges Paid

Notably, the latest 288 ETH transaction charge is the newest in a collection of comparable incidents. The very best transaction charge ever paid for a single transaction within the community stays the 7,676 ETH ($23.5 million), a determine paid by crypto trade Bitfinex final 12 months.

An earlier report exhibits that one other person paid 34.62 ETH, valued at $92,504. Curiously, the pockets paid extra in charges than it transferred, as knowledge confirmed it moved a mere 0.87 ETH.

One other person additionally paid 121.56 ETH ($157,764) to switch 183 ETH ($237,502). Notably, this transaction charge was 78,882% greater than the common $2 charge on the Ethereum community.

Contents
Fats Finger?Different Enormous Transaction Charges Paid

You Might Also Like

Ethereum (ETH) and 7 Other Altcoins Made Big Buys!

Ethereum Price Loses Steam—But Maintains Bullish Structure Above Support

Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs Shifted in Ethereum’s Favorite Way! 11-Day Entry Series Recorded! Here Are the Details

Ethereum Approaches A “Never Broken” Support Line: Accumulators Step In

Ethereum Institutional Accumulation Frenzy: Bitmine Expands Holdings With Another Massive Strategic ETH Buy

TAGGED:EthereumEthereum News
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link
Previous Article Bitcoin Whale Raises Holdings by 200 $BTC Following $181M in Gains Bitcoin Whale Raises Holdings by 200 $BTC Following $181M in Gains
Next Article Bitcoin Mining Profitability Fell in September, Jefferies Says Bitcoin Mining Profitability Fell in September, Jefferies Says
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -

Popular News

SONEX launches on Soneium’s mainnet 
SONEX launches on Soneium’s mainnet 
Tangle Network Partners with Orochi Network to Advance Blockchain Capabilities
Tangle Network Partners with Orochi Network to Advance Blockchain Capabilities
Green searchlight metaphor. Alt: Green editorial collage of a searchlight illuminating Bitcoin and Tether marks on a Paraguay map amid torn bank and riverfront photos.
Bitcoin and USDT attract modest premiums in Paraguay as millions face banking crisis
Magenta and acid-green editorial collage of a mechanical scale holding a Binance-embossed archive case, separated from a Bitcoin-marked printer issuing a sell-taker receipt.
Bitcoin traders could mistake this Binance data change for a rush to sell
In this photo illustration, 'Binance' logo is displayed on a screen in Ankara.
Binance CFO is leaving to ‘pursue a new venture’ after $6.3 billion hack
Magenta and acid-green editorial collage of a Bitcoin-engraved magnifier enlarging a Q3 unit labor cost decline beside a separate October payroll report and factory photograph.
Higher wages don’t have to mean higher inflation. That could matter for Bitcoin
- Advertisement -

You Might Also Like

Ethereum Order Flow Just Flipped Positive On Binance: Bullish Setup Forming?
Ethereum

Ethereum Order Flow Just Flipped Positive On Binance: Bullish Setup Forming?

April 25, 2026
Major Technical Divergence Emerges on the Ethereum Chart as Price Holds but Buying Pressure Fades
Ethereum

Major Technical Divergence Emerges on the Ethereum Chart as Price Holds but Buying Pressure Fades

June 18, 2025
Ethereum Price Losing Ground—Is a Drop to $1,550 Inevitable?
Ethereum

Ethereum Price Losing Ground—Is a Drop to $1,550 Inevitable?

April 6, 2025
Ethereum
Ethereum

Ethereum Is Bullish In March: Here’s How It Has Performed In Previous Years

March 3, 2026
Mycryptopot

"Welcome to MyCryptoPot, your go-to source for the latest insights and developments in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency.

Editor Choice

Expert sets date when Bitcoin will hit $150,000 as BTC ‘shows first signs of life’
Ethereum price is trapped, but leverage ratio points to a rebound
Buy USD dips tactically after Trump win, Citi says

Follow Us on Socials

We use social media to react to breaking news, update supporters and share information

Facebook Twitter Telegram
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Reading: This User Just Paid $700,402 as Ethereum Transaction Fees to Send Nothing
Share
© 2024 All Rights reserved | Powered by Crypto My Crypto Pot
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?