Bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI infrastructure as income per megawatt from serving AI workloads runs 5 to 10 instances increased than from mining Bitcoin, and the post-halving squeeze has turned that hole right into a strategic mandate.
Singapore Summit: Meet the most important APAC brokers you understand (and people you continue to do not!).
The clearest sign thus far is Bitfarms (NASDAQ: BITF), which introduced it’s re-domiciling, renaming itself Keel Infrastructure, and halting all new Bitcoin mining funding.
“We’re not making any investments into Bitcoin mining,” mentioned govt Ben Gagnon, framing the corporate as an “infrastructure developer and proprietor.”
We’re formally Keel Infrastructure! Constructed for the accelerating demand for HPC and AI—with the facility, places, and execution to ship.
Discover our new web site → https://t.co/3VI028F01M pic.twitter.com/D6ubEMP1lc— Keel Infrastructure (@keelinfra_) April 1, 2026
A Clear Development
It is not a one-off case. Core Scientific (CORZ) and TeraWulf (WULF) have largely repositioned as HPC operators and signed multi-year contracts with hyperscalers.
Riot Platforms (RIOT), Iris Power (IREN), and Hut 8 have every introduced plans to redirect vital energy capability towards AI purchasers.
Analysts estimate that by finish of 2027, as much as 20% of the Bitcoin mining business’s whole energy capability could possibly be repurposed for AI and HPC workloads.
Why Miners Have an Edge
The pivot works as a result of miners already maintain what the AI business cannot shortly purchase: large-scale websites with high-voltage energy contracts and the infrastructure permits to match.
Hyperscalers are going through two-to-four-year delays simply to get new knowledge centres grid-connected. Miners can deliver AI capability on-line in a single to 2 years.
Goldman Sachs forecasts U.S. knowledge middle energy demand rising at a 15% compound annual fee by 2030, pushed predominantly by AI.
The Valuation Play
The monetary logic is as essential because the operational one. Bitcoin miners usually commerce at 6–12x EBITDA. Information middle operators commerce at 20–25x.
A profitable transition from unstable commodity manufacturing to infrastructure-as-a-service — with long-term leases and predictable money flows — implies a considerable a number of re-rating. That is the guess these corporations are making.
For brokers and traders, the sensible consequence is sector reclassification. What traded as a pure-play crypto mining cohort is changing into a heterogeneous mixture of infrastructure corporations, AI-levered actual property performs, and residual Bitcoin producers.
Making use of uniform crypto-cycle logic to your entire group is more and more the unsuitable body.
