A set of community-led initiatives went dwell on April 14 to assist Neo stakeholders examine, focus on, and contribute to the governance reform dialog sparked by competing proposals from co-founders Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang. The sources embody a side-by-side comparability web site, a draft alignment proposal extracting shared rules, and 7 structured GitHub dialogue points for neighborhood suggestions on particular themes.
The efforts arrived in the future after Zhang revealed his Neo Governance Restoration Proposal, which adopted Da’s Neo Basis Restructuring Proposal on April 9. With two formal visions now on the desk, these instruments purpose to make the positions accessible and channel neighborhood enter towards areas the place compromise could also be doable.
Comparability web site serves as central hub
The comparability web site revealed by Neo Information In the present day at proposals.neonewstoday.com presents 21 governance subjects throughout each proposals in parallel columns, organized into seven thematic areas. Every subject carries a compatibility indicator – “Agree,” “Partial agree,” “Totally different angles,” or distinctive to 1 proposal – giving readers a fast sense of the place the founders align and the place they diverge.
The location is designed as an entry level to the broader dialogue. From every thematic part, customers are directed to a devoted GitHub difficulty the place they will weigh in on that particular space, in addition to to the alignment proposal and each unique paperwork.
Alignment proposal identifies 11 shared rules
Tyler Adams, CEO of COZ, created PR #223 as a draft meta-level NEP titled “Neo Governance Alignment.” The doc distills 11 foundational rules the 2 proposals share, establishing frequent floor as a place to begin for reconciliation.
Among the many shared positions: each founders agree that Neo’s present governance is insufficient and requires pressing structural reform, {that a} five-seat Board of Administrators ought to function the Basis’s govt physique, that an impartial Supervisor ought to present oversight separated from the Board, and that on-chain governance outcomes ought to carry binding pressure inside Basis governance. Each additionally name for steady monetary transparency and multi-party controls on Basis property.
The doc leaves detailed implementation sections marked as “TBD,” explicitly designed to resolve remaining variations by way of neighborhood dialogue fairly than prescribing options upfront.
Seven dialogue points break down key themes
To offer the dialog construction, seven GitHub points (#224 – #230) have been created as a bundle related to the alignment proposal. Every difficulty covers a definite governance theme:
- Authorized construction and constitutional design.
- Tokenholder authority and voting mannequin.
- Board composition and Supervisor design.
- Transition guidelines and founder position boundaries.
- Public asset stewardship, attribution, and management.
- Accountability, historic assessment, and enforcement scope.
- Tokenomics and redistribution measures.
Every difficulty summarizes each proposals’ positions on the subject, identifies frequent floor, highlights divergences, and poses particular determination questions for the neighborhood.
The place the proposals diverge
Whereas the diploma of structural overlap might shock those that have adopted the general public disagreements since late 2025, significant variations stay. Da proposes redomiciling the Basis to the Cayman Islands and introduces a particular token redistribution plan, whereas Zhang focuses on detailed historic accountability mechanisms and assigns Board seats by practical area fairly than background profile. Da additionally proposes a 24-month exclusion interval for founders from governance roles.
The comparability web site gives the complete image throughout all 21 subjects for many who need to discover the small print.
Tips on how to take part
Group members trying to interact can begin at proposals.neonewstoday.com to know every founder’s place throughout governance subjects, then contribute to the precise GitHub dialogue points the place their enter is most related.
The alignment proposal at PR #223 gives extra context on the shared rules being proposed as a basis for transferring ahead.
