Bitcoin’s weekend selloff led to about $100 billion in crypto market worth losses throughout the reporting interval and was triggered by a sudden burst of tariff coverage uncertainty.
During the last 24 hours, BTC worth had slipped beneath $65,000, pulling the broader crypto market down with it. The highest digital asset had recovered above $66,000 as of press time, in accordance with mycryptopot’s information.
Notably, liquidations amplified the transfer. CoinGlass information confirmed that greater than $500 million in crypto positions have been worn out throughout the swing, with the most important single liquidation reported on HTX’s BTC-USDT pair at about $61.51 million.
These losses signify the type of compelled unwind that may flip a macro headline into a quick, self-reinforcing transfer in crypto.
Consequently, the crypto market sentiment additionally cracked. Based on Alphractal’s information, the crypto Worry and Greed Index fell to five, labeled “Excessive Worry,” a stage not seen since 2019.
Whether or not merchants deal with that as a contrarian sign or a warning signal, it match the tape as traders have been de-risking first and asking questions later.
Bitcoin curiosity hits 5-year excessive in america defying bear market worth decline
A court docket ruling set off a series response, then the coverage path modified once more
The instant set off of this market rout was political and authorized.
On Feb. 20, the US Supreme Court docket struck down a broad swath of tariffs imposed underneath the Worldwide Emergency Financial Powers Act (IEEPA).
Reuters later reported that US Customs and Border Safety mentioned it could halt assortment of these IEEPA tariffs at 12:01 a.m. EST on Tuesday, Feb. 24, greater than three days after the ruling, whereas additionally offering no instant steerage on refunds.
That alone would have been sufficient to create confusion. As a substitute, the White Home moved rapidly to switch the struck-down tariffs with a brand new framework.
On Feb. 20, President Donald Trump invoked Part 122 of the Commerce Act of 1974 and imposed a ten% advert valorem momentary import surcharge for 150 days, efficient Feb. 24. He later revised the numbers to fifteen%.
He wrote on Fact Social:
“I, as President of america of America, might be, efficient instantly, elevating the ten% Worldwide Tariff on International locations, a lot of which have been “ripping” the U.S. off for many years, with out retribution (till I got here alongside!), to the absolutely allowed, and legally examined, 15% stage. Through the subsequent quick variety of months, the Trump Administration will decide and difficulty the brand new and legally permissible Tariffs, which is able to proceed our terribly profitable strategy of Making America Nice Once more.”
That sequence issues for crypto as a result of the problem was not simply the tariff stage. It was the tempo and unpredictability of the modifications.
Markets needed to course of a court docket resolution, a delayed company implementation, a brand new govt workaround, after which a better fee, all in the identical information cycle.
For a market that trades across the clock and makes use of leverage closely, that may be a volatility occasion.
The true macro transmission was uncertainty, not simply tariffs
The crypto market selloff occurred in a macro atmosphere already fragile.
The US Financial Coverage Uncertainty Index on FRED printed 706.97 for Feb. 19, a pointy soar that captured how rapidly coverage noise had change into a tradable macro issue.
The separate FRED categorical Commerce Coverage Uncertainty index was already elevated at 3,027.14433 in December 2025.
In different phrases, crypto was not hit from a relaxed baseline. It was hit in an atmosphere that was already primed for disorderly repricing.
There may be additionally a second layer to the shock, the fiscal and balance-sheet overhang created by the court docket resolution.
Penn Wharton Price range Mannequin estimated that reversing the IEEPA tariffs may generate as much as $175 billion in refunds.
It additionally mentioned IEEPA receipts had been working at about $500 million per day underneath the prevailing tariff schedule.
These numbers are giant sufficient to have an effect on Treasury money circulate assumptions, importer steadiness sheets, and, by extension, the danger premium traders demand in leveraged or cyclical property.
That could be a direct channel into crypto. When macro uncertainty rises, traders reduce leverage, scale back elective threat, and transfer towards liquidity.
Crypto feels that rapidly as a result of it’s typically the primary market the place positioning is gentle sufficient to trim and liquid sufficient to exit.
In the meantime, the tariff story additionally doesn’t robotically translate right into a clear inflation unwind.
US banking big Goldman Sachs reportedly suggested shoppers to not anticipate costs to fall rapidly even after tariffs are lifted, as a result of firms have a tendency to boost costs quicker than they reduce them.
Goldman estimated tariff passthrough had lifted core PCE by about 0.7% by way of January, with solely about 0.1% extra influence anticipated for the remainder of 2026.
That reinforces the concept that the dominant market variables listed below are uncertainty and margin strain, not a recent inflation surge in itself.
Cross-asset indicators lined up with that interpretation. Reporting on the tariff reversal and alternative described the greenback weakening and gold rising whereas BTC fell.
It is a acquainted sample when traders transfer towards conventional defensive property and deal with crypto as a threat car somewhat than a protected haven.
Commerce coverage continuity, not readability, stored threat urge for food underneath strain
If the Supreme Court docket ruling was speculated to calm markets, the follow-through did the alternative.
Reuters reported that US Commerce Consultant Jamieson Greer mentioned international locations with current commerce offers weren’t transferring to withdraw and that the administration would preserve coverage continuity, whereas additionally rebuilding its commerce technique by way of different authorized instruments, together with Part 301 and Part 232.
He additionally mentioned Trump raised the momentary tariff to fifteen% due to the “urgency of the scenario.”
That posture helped protect tariff coverage, however it didn’t scale back uncertainty.
The European Fee responded by demanding “full readability” from Washington and insisting that “a deal is a deal,” after Trump moved from the court docket setback to a short lived 10% tariff after which to fifteen% inside a day.
Reuters additionally famous that the EU’s comparative benefit seems to have narrowed as a result of international locations with out a deal could now face the identical 15% headline fee.
For markets, that’s the downside in a single body. Coverage continuity exists, however coverage readability doesn’t.
And when readability is lacking, capital tends to shorten length and scale back threat. That’s what crypto traded like over the weekend.
Bitcoin is now again on the ranges the place positioning can speed up the following transfer
Inside crypto, the macro shock hit a market that was already technically delicate.
Based on mycryptopot information, $65,000 was already a key assist space for the highest crypto, with a break beneath probably accelerating the decline in the direction of $60,000. Nonetheless, a restoration again may assist shift the tone and push the flagship asset above $70,000.
In the meantime, the market had additionally seen a rise in choices hedging and draw back safety clustered round $60,000, which might make that stage extra essential if spot weakens once more.
That setup explains why the weekend transfer felt bigger than the headline alone. Tariff uncertainty hit macro sentiment, forcing liquidations to speed up the drop, and the market landed close to ranges the place choices positioning can begin to form short-term worth motion.
So, the following section will probably rely much less on another tariff headline and extra on whether or not the coverage path turns into simpler to map over the following 150 days.
A grinding base case is feasible, with a short lived surcharge in place, recurring authorized and administrative noise, and crypto caught in a large, risky vary. A aid rally can be doable if refund steerage improves and the market begins to consider there are actual boundaries across the tariff regime.
Nonetheless, the danger situation remains to be the one macro merchants will watch most carefully, a shift from momentary surcharge politics right into a broader, longer commerce battle that deepens risk-off positioning throughout property.
For crypto, the sign to look at isn’t one inexperienced candle. It’s whether or not coverage volatility stays elevated and whether or not traders proceed treating digital property as the primary to chop when macro noise rises.
