My $49k Bitcoin bear thesis, a January check-in, the plumbing is flashing whereas worth bleeds
I wrote my medium-term $49,000 bear thesis in late November with one easy concept, Bitcoin nonetheless strikes in cycles, and the subsequent actual “that is the low” second tends to reach when miner economics and flows line up on the similar time.
It’s now Jan. 30, 2026, and the trustworthy replace is that this, the variables I care about look extra harassed than they did once I revealed, and the tape has not delivered the type of panic worth print that makes these variables matter to everybody without delay.
Considerably paradoxically, my ‘medium-term bear thesis’ was supposed to be long-term bullish. The thought being that we might get a brief, sharp bear market with max ache adopted by a sustained, multi-year bull run. Nevertheless, the worth is not fairly matching with the indicators proper now.
Bitcoin is hovering across the low $80,000s (after falling to $81,000 in a single day) as I write this, which implies my high-$40ks zone has not even become visible but.
That disconnect is the story.
As a result of beneath the worth, the elements of the system that pay for Bitcoin’s safety, and the elements that transfer institutional measurement, are appearing like winter already arrived.
The winter feeling is coming from charges, not the chart
Begin with the safety finances, as a result of that was my unique “fragility” declare.
On Jan. 29, miners earned about $37.22 million in day by day income.
On the identical date, whole transaction charges paid per day had been about $260,550.
Do the mathematics and also you get the temper music, charges are roughly 0.7% of miner income.
That’s not “charges are weak,” that’s “charges are principally absent,” within the sense that the charge market is contributing virtually nothing to the price of securing the chain on a day-to-day foundation.
Even the dwell mempool image appears sleepy. The projected next-block median charge charge is round 0.12 to 0.14 sat/vB proper now.
So when folks ask why I preserve circling again to miner economics, it’s as a result of that is what a charge flooring failing appears like in actual time. The community leans on issuance, issuance steps down on schedule, and every part else has to choose up the slack later.
The ETF window has been a gradual leak, with a couple of ugly gulps
The second leg of my framework was stream elasticity, the concept that the ETF period creates a clear, mechanical method to see danger urge for food flip.
In January, that elasticity has been pointing within the fallacious route.
On Farside, the previous few weeks present a number of heavy outflow prints, together with -$708.7M on Jan. 21 and -$817.8M on Jan. 29.
Complete web flows are additionally damaging at -$1.095B year-to-date. That issues greater than any single day as a result of it adjustments the psychology of dips. Within the soft-landing model of my thesis, the tape will get help from persistent dip shopping for by means of the ETF pipe. Proper now, the pipe has been taking water out.
There have been huge inexperienced days earlier within the month too, Jan. 13 at +$753.8M and Jan. 14 at +$840.6M, and people are actual, however the late-month stream prints have been the type you’re feeling on a desk.
In case you commerce for a dwelling, you realize this sensation, worth holds up, the internals begin to rot, and everybody retains in search of the second the chart lastly displays what the plumbing has been saying.
Hashrate is wobbling, miners are adapting, and that adaptation adjustments habits
One other piece of the setup is miner elasticity.
Hashrate remains to be big, however it has been swinging. On Jan. 29 the day by day common is roughly 901 EH/s, down from earlier peaks this month.
That by itself doesn’t equal capitulation, and I’m not attempting to power a dramatic story onto routine variance. It does match the broader level, miners now have extra knobs to show.
A very powerful knob is the one no one talked about in prior cycles, AI and HPC internet hosting.
When a miner indicators long-duration compute offers, that enterprise begins to look much less like a pure BTC margin machine and extra like an influence, land, and infrastructure operator that occurs to mine Bitcoin.
TeraWulf put that shift in daring print when it introduced two 10-year HPC colocation agreements with Fluidstack for 200+ MW, with Google backstopping a big portion of obligations and receiving an fairness stake, per the corporate’s personal launch.
Riot has been exploring the identical route, together with a proper analysis to probably repurpose vital capability for AI and HPC, in response to DataCenterDynamics.
This issues for Bitcoin market construction as a result of it adjustments the incentives round hashrate on the lows.
A miner with a second income stream can behave otherwise below stress. They could curtail or redirect capability with out rapid existential strain, they could shield liquidity for buildouts, they could promote BTC extra mechanically to fund capex, they could merely cease caring about marginal hashprice in the way in which a pure miner as soon as did.
That’s the elasticity I used to be pointing at, and it’s beginning to present up within the knowledge’s tone even whereas worth sits excessive.
So what’s the “state of the thesis” proper now
Right here is the cleanest method I can say it in a single breath.
The charge flooring appears damaged, ETF flows have been risk-off for weeks, and the miner enterprise mannequin is evolving in a method that may amplify reflexive habits throughout drawdowns.
These are the situations I wrote about.
The lacking ingredient is the half folks bear in mind, the chart dumping into the zone the place panic turns into stock switch.
Bitcoin at $82k doesn’t power anybody to make that call. A print within the $40ks would.
That’s the reason this replace is much less about worth targets and extra about stress. The system is constructing stress.
| Situation | Backside Worth (USD) | Timing Window | Path Form | Key Triggers Into Low (Jan 30, 2026 standing) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | 49,000 | Q1–Q2 2026 | 2–3 sharp legs decrease, basing | ✅ Hashprice spot sub-$40/PH/day ✅ Price% of miner income < 10% (excessive, ~<1% on newest prints) ✅ 20D ETF flows damaging (web outflows during the last 20 buying and selling days) ⚠️ “Forwards sub-$40 for weeks” depends upon whether or not you deal with spot because the proxy, forwards have a near-dated hump |
| Delicate-landing | 56,000–60,000 | H2 2025 | Single flush, vary | ❌ Price% > 15% sustained (reverse, charges are very low) ❌ Secure hashrate (has proven significant variance this month) ❌ Combined to optimistic ETF flows on down days (late-Jan confirmed heavy outflows) |
| Deep minimize | 36,000–42,000 | Late 2026–Q1 2027 | Waterfall, quick | ⚠️ Macro risk-off (not a single on-chain metric, combined sign exterior this desk) ✅ Price drought (supported by charges and feerates) ⚠️ Miner misery (not “capitulation,” however stress seen by way of low hashprice) ⚠️ Persistent ETF outflows (latest window damaging, “persistent” over longer horizon nonetheless TBD) |
The human-interest angle folks miss, miners are operating two corporations without delay
If you cut back this to “charges are down,” it seems like a chart observe.
In actual life it appears like operators attempting to maintain the lights on, negotiating energy contracts, planning buildouts, courting AI clients, juggling shareholders, and nonetheless needing to compete in probably the most brutal hash race on earth.
A low-fee atmosphere doesn’t simply weaken the safety finances, it forces miners to get artistic, and creativity introduces new behaviors into the market.
The bottom-case bear I described in November was all the time about that habits exhibiting up similtaneously stream strain, after which worth lastly doing the factor it does when leverage and narrative crack collectively.
Proper now, two of these levers are already pulled.
What would make me say the bear is resolving early
I’m maintaining my flip-level framework, and I’m maintaining it boring on objective.
- Charges have to cease dwelling within the mud, the YCharts charge line must rebuild an actual flooring relative to the YCharts income line.
- ETF stream habits wants to alter, the Farside desk wants to point out constant dip shopping for once more, not late-month air pockets.
- Mempool situations have to really feel alive once more, charge strain exhibiting up within the mempool medians in a method that means actual settlement demand.
If these occur whereas worth stays elevated, the “shortest winter but” framing begins to win.
If these keep weak and worth finally breaks, the $49k model print stays in play as a liquidity magnet, as a result of that’s the place the client base tends to alter character.
The place I stand in the present day
I would not have the cathartic conclusion that each market story needs, as a result of the market has not given it but.
The infrastructure tells me winter situations are already right here.
The chart tells me the gang has not felt them.
That hole is the factor to observe, as a result of gaps like this don’t often persist eternally.
And after they shut, they shut quick.




