
Texas has moved a step nearer to holding Bitcoin (BTC) as a reserve asset, with the state senate passing a invoice on March 6 that will permit public funds to be allotted to digital property.
The choice locations Texas on the forefront of a rising pattern amongst states exploring crypto investments following President Donald Trump’s name for a federal strategic crypto reserve.
State-level momentum
The Texas invoice, SB 21, would allow the state to spend money on Bitcoin, a transfer its sponsor, Senator Charles Schwertner, described as a hedge towards inflation and monetary instability. Schwertner argued that Bitcoin has repeatedly confirmed its resilience by means of financial cycles, making it a viable reserve asset.
New Hampshire additionally superior its personal laws this week. On March 5, a state home committee permitted Home Invoice 302 by a 16-1 vote, paving the best way for the state to take a position as much as 5% of public funds in bitcoin and valuable metals. The invoice now awaits a full vote within the state legislature.
In the meantime, Utah is operating out of time to finalize an analogous proposal. The state’s legislative session ends on March 7, and its invoice — already handed by the state home — nonetheless awaits a vote within the Senate.
If permitted, it will permit Utah to allocate public funds to digital property valued at over $500 billion in market capitalization, a criterion that presently applies solely to Bitcoin. Governor Spencer Cox, a Republican who has beforehand supported blockchain initiatives, would then determine whether or not to signal it into regulation.
Federal crypto reserve
The surge in state-level crypto laws follows Trump’s renewed push for a nationwide crypto reserve, which he introduced on social media on March 2. The US President outlined a plan that might embrace digital property past Bitcoin.
Business leaders have largely pushed again towards together with a number of cryptocurrencies, arguing that Bitcoin alone has the traits obligatory for a reserve asset akin to gold.
Uncertainty stays over how the federal government would supply or handle such a portfolio, and no formal coverage framework has been proposed.
With some states shifting aggressively towards bitcoin adoption and others going through legislative roadblocks, the controversy over cryptocurrency’s position in public finance is anticipated to accentuate within the coming months.




