The gorgeous collapse of the Terra blockchain mission and its two tokens, the UST stablecoin and LUNA utility token, was an unprecedented occasion within the brief and intensely turbulent historical past of cryptocurrency. It reportedly vaporized billions of {dollars} in crypto wealth and left 1000’s of traders nearly penniless.
With so many individuals shedding a lot, there have been a whole lot of eyebrows raised when, simply a few weeks later, Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon introduced an audacious plan to revive the Terra blockchain through a fork, and with that, the launch a brand new token that’s now often known as LUNA 2.0.
What Occurred To Terra Luna?
The Terra blockchain was one of the vital bold cryptocurrency tasks ever launched, with the objective of turning into a hub for decentralized finance. Key to this plan was Terra’s distinctive, algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD, in any other case often known as UST.
Do Kwon’s considering was that having a stablecoin is completely elementary to the success of any DeFi ecosystem. Crypto merchants and speculators don’t like cashing out into fiat {dollars} as a result of it’s time-consuming and costly and invitations plenty of trouble and issues. Due to this, stablecoins have develop into extremely widespread. Decentralized exchanges use stablecoins similar to Tether and USDC to settle transactions and create buying and selling pairs, and traders all the time hold a provide available to rapidly transfer into, and out of positions.
Nonetheless, not everybody trusts stablecoins. Tether and USDC are each asset-backed stablecoins operated by centralized corporations that successfully keep management over these tokens and have the flexibility to freeze customers’ wallets at any time. That goes towards the very thought of decentralization. Including to the considerations, particularly within the case of Tether, is a perceived lack of transparency over the precise nature of the belongings it makes use of to again the USDT token.
Do Kwon created UST as a decentralized various to these stablecoins, however he didn’t have billions of {dollars} price of money and different liquid belongings to again the coin up with. To that finish, he as an alternative created UST as an “algorithmic” stablecoin that maintains its 1:1 peg to the U.S. greenback utilizing a fancy mathematical algorithm.
How UST Was Supposed To Work
In keeping with Terra’s whitepaper, the objective of the mission was to create a very dependable and scalable peer-to-peer digital money system. The plan concerned two cash whose fates had been intently intertwined with each other – the price-stable UST and the growth-driven LUNA that might assist UST keep its peg with out the necessity for money reserves.
Terra’s mechanism relied on good contracts that had been designed to anchor the worth of UST to the U.S. greenback. It labored by incentivizing holders of LUNA to burn or mint new tokens to earn arbitrage rewards. So, if UST’s worth rose above $1.00, LUNA holders may earn a revenue by swapping $1.00 price of LUNA to mint a brand new UST token. They may then promote these tokens for a slight revenue. As extra individuals did this, it had the impact of diluting the availability of UST to carry its worth again right down to $1.00.
However, if the worth of UST fell under $1.00, UST holders may earn a risk-free revenue by swapping their UST at a 1:1 ratio for LUNA. The UST would then be burned by Terra, lowering the availability of tokens and bringing its worth again as much as $1.00.
UST labored effectively sufficient but it surely wasn’t till early 2021 when it actually took off in recognition with the launch of Anchor, a DeFi protocol designed to encourage individuals to put money into its ecosystem for an eye-popping 20% APY. Following the launch of Anchor, LUNA’s worth elevated one-hundred fold, whereas virtually $10 billion price of UST was minted. LUNA turned a high ten cryptocurrency token by way of market capitalization, whereas UST emerged because the fourth-largest stablecoin behind Tether, USDC and Binance USD.
In an post-mortem of Terra’s collapse, AAX Academy, the analysis arm of the AAX Trade, defined the significance of the Anchor Protocol and its position in UST/LUNA’s progress. It famous that the reward on provide was orders of magnitude higher than any financial institution would provide. As a result of that, Anchor attracted huge quantities of cash that was historically earmarked for low-risk investments.
“Demand for UST elevated quickly, leapfrogging the market cap of many extra established fiat-backed stablecoins like TUSD, GUSD and algo cousin DAI,” AAX Academy acknowledged. “Most of that demand got here from the unusually excessive 20% APY rewarded to stakers of UST on Anchor Protocol.”
How It Fell Aside
Regardless of a couple of wobbles and quite a few critics labeling Anchor Protocol as a “rip-off” or a “ponzi scheme”, UST managed to retain its 1:1 peg with the U.S. greenback for over a 12 months, solely to come back crashing down within the blink of a watch. On Could 9 UST all of a sudden depegged, however as an alternative of regaining its peg as many assumed it could do, it stored on falling, with its worth collapsing to only 7 cents inside 48 hours. In the meantime, LUNA collapsed much more spectacularly, falling from its April peak of $116 (when it had a market cap of over $40 billion) to only a fraction of a cent by Could 11.
Although the crypto business has seen these sorts of implosions earlier than, it had solely ever occurred to small-cap memecoins – for a token as large as LUNA, it was merely unprecedented.
“Luna’s worth went sub-zero, received delisted and relisted by main exchanges, and its provide elevated by 20 fold. All inside simply a few days actually,” AAX Academy wrote. “Many hundreds of thousands went up in smoke. Each the money parked within the ‘protected’ choice on Anchor in addition to cash held in LUNA.”
The precise reason for Terra’s crash stays unclear, although there was hypothesis that the ecosystem was focused in some sort of an assault launched by hedge funds.
Simply week’s previous to the collapse, Do Kwon made recognized his plans to purchase $10 billion price of Bitcoin with the intention of utilizing it as a reserve asset to assist UST defend its peg. In idea it was a stable thought, as a result of Bitcoin is a bearer-asset, absolutely decentralized and never embedded into the TradFi system, in contrast to Tether’s industrial paper reserves, for instance.
Nonetheless, critics of the transfer, together with AAX Academy, warned that by doing so, Do Kwon was successfully placing a goal on UST. AAX famous that it could solely take a couple of whales (holders of huge quantities of BTC) to destabilize UST’s peg and create a financial institution run, forcing the Luna Basis Guard to unload its reserves so they may choose up BTC on a budget.
That seems to be what occurred. A particularly widespread idea emerged on this Twitter thread that has since been retweeted over 10,000 instances and has greater than 31,000 likes. It claims that one cryptocurrency pockets all of a sudden dumped over $350 million price of UST in an try to push it off its peg and power the worth under $1.00. This led to the LFG aggressively promoting off its Bitcoin holdings to try to keep UST’s peg.
The speculation goes that the attacker additionally held a serious BTC brief place and subsequently needed to see Bitcoin’s worth go down. With LFG promoting virtually the whole lot of its BTC reserves, that’s precisely what occurred – Bitcoin’s worth collapsed, netting the attacker an estimated revenue of over $800 million.
For Terra the run was completely disastrous. By the center of Could there have been greater than six trillion LUNA cash in circulation with a worth of $0.0002. Whereas it was nonetheless theoretically doable to redeem UST for a large quantity of LUNA price $1.00 and re-peg the stablecoin, the system fell aside as a result of an absence of consumers. LUNA had develop into nugatory, nobody needed to the touch it. So UST remained at only a fraction of its pegged worth.
Terra’s collapse despatched shockwaves via the cryptocurrency world, with nearly all different crypto tokens shedding worth within the days that adopted. Anchor’s native token fell greater than 70%, and even Tether briefly misplaced its peg to the U.S. greenback.
Will The Resurrection Succeed?
There was rather more to Terra’s ecosystem than simply UST. Certainly, the Terra blockchain was residence to dozens of extremely profitable DeFi tasks, together with the favored DeFi protocol and varied play-to-earn video video games and NFTs. As a way to save this ecosystem and attempt to return among the misplaced worth to LUNA and UST holders, Do Kwon rapidly introduced a reboot of Terra through a Terra 2.0 fork.
With the fork, Terra would resurrect its blockchain and the LUNA token however dispose of the UST stablecoin in an acknowledgment that it had misplaced all belief. As soon as the group voted to go forward, Terra rapidly set about placing its plan into motion and Terra 2.0 was born earlier than the month was out.
LUNA 2.0 has, not surprisingly, seen a whole lot of volatility since its launch. Inside minutes the brand new token popped, its worth rising quick. That was adopted by a just-as-rapid crash within the worth as UST holders who acquired the brand new token through an airdrop determined to money out whereas the going was good. Nonetheless, LUNA 2.0’s worth has since rebounded, pushed by demand from those that imagine Terra nonetheless has a future.
The jury continues to be out on Terra’s probabilities of rebuilding. As AAX defined, on the one hand it nonetheless has a robust developer group with plenty of profitable tasks, the community runs easily and plenty of of its dApps had a big person base. However alternatively, with no 20% APY within the offing, Terra has misplaced the primary driver of its authentic, meteoric progress.
Terra’s drawback is it must bounce again from probably the most sudden and spectacular lack of confidence that was ever to hit any cryptocurrency mission. Regaining that confidence received’t be simple. Terra has a minimum of taken an important step, choosing group governance slightly than being led by Do Kwon himself. However the cryptocurrency crowd is a troublesome one to please although, and it’ll seemingly take much more than decentralized management for Terra to get better its misplaced status.
Ceaselessly Requested Questions
What brought on the collapse of Terra Luna and UST?
The collapse was triggered by UST shedding its greenback peg, which led to a loss of life spiral with its sister token LUNA. The algorithmic system failed to keep up stability, particularly below stress from giant withdrawals, inflicting each tokens to crash in worth.
How did Terra’s UST stablecoin work?
UST was an algorithmic stablecoin backed by LUNA via a mint-and-burn mechanism. Customers may swap LUNA for UST and vice versa to keep up the 1:1 peg with the U.S. greenback. Nonetheless, this method relied closely on market confidence and failed throughout a liquidity crunch.
What’s Terra 2.0 and the way is it completely different?
Terra 2.0 is a fork of the unique Terra blockchain that excludes the failed UST stablecoin. The objective was to relaunch the ecosystem below a brand new token, LUNA 2.0, and rebuild belief with the group and builders via decentralization and airdrops to affected holders.
Is LUNA 2.0 performing effectively in 2025?
LUNA 2.0 has skilled volatility since launch. Whereas there’s renewed developer curiosity, the mission continues to be recovering from a serious confidence disaster. Its long-term success depends upon ecosystem progress and regaining person belief.
Was Terra’s collapse brought on by an assault?
Although unconfirmed, a broadly circulated idea suggests that giant merchants might have exploited Terra’s reserve mechanics by shorting Bitcoin and destabilizing UST to power reserve gross sales. This triggered a cascading impact resulting in the downfall.