A dialogue over Dogecoin’s safety mannequin ensued on X after Dogecoin Basis developer Paulo Vidal requested why Dogecoin stays depending on one other blockchain for its safety.
In accordance with Vidal, Dogecoin largely incentivizes merge mining; nevertheless, it doesn’t have impartial mining. He argues that because of this, its safety is tied to a different community, on this case Litecoin.
“Ought to Dogecoin finally be capable of safe itself, or ought to it all the time depend upon Litecoin?” Vidal requested.
Participating with Vidal’s submit, a Dogecoin developer who goes by “junior developer” with X deal with “Chromatic X” maintained a distinct view, pushing again on the belief that Dogecoin depends upon Litecoin for its safety.
“Nonetheless unsuitable. Dogecoin doesn’t depend upon Litecoin. It depends upon all merge-mined L1 scrypt cash,” Chromatic X acknowledged.
Nonetheless unsuitable.
Dogecoin doesn’t depend upon Litecoin. It depends upon *all* merge mined L1 scrypt cash.
Additionally “Dogecoin ought to be capable of safe itself (alone)” is a philosophical purity place, no matter how a lot you attempt to persuade your self in any other case. https://t.co/RDhzKzdEvy
— ☣ junior developer ☣ (@chromatic_x) July 18, 2026
Merge mining permits customers to mine two or extra cash with the identical hash energy and proof-of-work algorithm with no splitting required. Cash that help merge mining embrace Dogecoin, Litecoin, Namecoin, and several other different Scrypt-based cash.
Dogecoin and Litecoin stay the most important and most worthwhile mixture for merge mining. This similar view was echoed by Dogecoin co-founder Billy Markus, “Shibetoshi Nakamoto,” who additionally joined the X dialog.
“Doge is probably the most worthwhile scrypt coin to mine. Auxpow simply permits you to mine it with some other scrypt coin,” Markus commented.
Dogecoin Litecoin Merge Mining
Dogecoin and Litecoin carried out merge mining in August 2014. Earlier than this time, Dogecoin confronted potential safety dangers resulting from its smaller hash fee, making it weak to 51% assaults as a result of fewer miners secured the community.
Now, 12 years later, the dialogue is rising a few potential shift, with a key query raised about whether or not “Dogecoin ought to be capable of safe itself alone.” The query stays unanswered and continues to divide individuals.
It’s a philosophical purity place that “Dogecoin ought to be capable of safe itself alone,” based on Chromatic X. However there are some within the Dogecoin neighborhood who assume that it could be time for a change.
The thought of ditching merge mining could not go down properly with some within the crypto neighborhood, together with builders, as a result of “most merge-mined scrypt-based cryptos depend upon Dogecoin’s issuance to make them viable to mine,” Dogecoin Basis director Timothy Stebbing mentioned.


