Sameer Group CEO Syed Sameer is providing to dealer a non-public deal to unfreeze Justin Solar’s blacklisted $WLFI tokens, drawing backlash from retail holders shut out of negotiations.
Syed Sameer, CEO of Sameer Group LLC, has put himself ahead as an institutional mediator within the escalating combat between Justin Solar and World Liberty Monetary ($WLFI) over frozen $WLFI tokens.
Tagging Solar instantly, Sameer wrote that as “one of many largest institutional $WLFI holders alongside Aryam 1 & Aqua 1 ($300M+ mixed), we’re prepared and prepared to dealer a good decision to your scenario and have your tokens unlocked.”
.@justinsuntron – As CEO of Sameer Group LLC and one of many largest institutional $WLFI holders alongside Aryam 1 & Aqua 1 ($300M+ mixed), we’re prepared and prepared to dealer a good decision to your scenario and have your tokens unlocked.
My UAE institutional companions and… https://t.co/ifT6eFFBcL
— Syed Sameer (@syedsameer) April 22, 2026
The supply landed hours after Solar introduced, “Right this moment, I filed a lawsuit in California federal court docket towards World Liberty Monetary to guard my authorized rights as a holder of $WLFI tokens,” stressing that he “stay[s] an ardent supporter of President Trump and his Administration’s efforts to make America crypto pleasant.”
Sameer framed his proposal as a quick observe in contrast with courtroom escalation, saying his UAE institutional companions might “facilitate this equitably and shortly by means of our established channels whereas avoiding a prolonged litigation course of,” and welcoming Solar to debate phrases by way of DM, Sign, or e mail.
Crucially, Sameer later clarified that the intervention targets blacklisting, not vesting mechanics.
Responding to group criticism, he wrote, “That is particularly about unfreezing / whitelisting Solar’s tokens – they’re blacklisted and never simply locked,” after which corrected himself: “Sorry – I meant unfrozen / reversing the blacklisting of his tokens. This has nothing to do with locks / vesting schedule.”
That distinction hasn’t calmed the backlash. One consumer argued, “That’s unfair decision who will mediate for different group members their token are unjustly locked with authoritarian governance,” whereas one other mentioned, “The proposal is horrible 2 12 months cliff isn’t wanted,” accusing $WLFI’s vesting setup of being a “rip-off” that “nobody in the neighborhood deserves nor voted for.”
Others zoomed out to the optics. Critics mocked the spectacle of “the world greatest scammer” being scammed and establishments attempting to wash it up; one other replied that $WLFI “wouldn’t must contact third half intermediaries if $WLFI stored their promise… Unlocked = unlocked Not again door locked by way of hidden code…,” highlighting fears of hidden management logic within the contract.
Sameer, who describes himself on X as managing “$650M+ AUM” and an institutional accomplice of the Solana Basis, is successfully providing a non-public, large‑holder backchannel to resolve Solar’s declare whereas the remainder of the $WLFI group watches from a budget seats. Whether or not that turns into a template — the place giant, politically related token holders negotiate bespoke fixes whereas smaller buyers are left to litigate or cope — will determine if this episode reads as pragmatic injury management or as the newest instance of two‑tier justice in crypto.




