Briefly
- The Coldcard firmware exploit drained roughly 2,100 $BTC, with losses estimated close to $130 million throughout a number of assault waves.
- Onchain knowledge from Checkonchain reveals 233,000 $BTC left long-term holder wallets within the days across the breach.
- Casa CEO Nick Neuman, citing precise buyer conversations, says a few of that 233,000 $BTC got here from Ledger and Trezor customers—not Coldcard homeowners—who upgraded to multisig after watching the hack unfold.
Within the days after the worst {hardware} pockets exploit in Bitcoin’s latest historical past, Casa CEO Nick Neuman started counting extra than simply the $BTC being drained from susceptible Coldcard wallets.
Whereas attackers had been draining Coldcard wallets one deal with at a time, 233,000 $BTC—price about $15 billion at as we speak’s costs—was quietly transferring looking for security.

The large and ongoing breach that began on July 30 has already led to shut to $130 million in stolen Bitcoin from Coldcard {hardware} wallets—bodily devices that retailer non-public keys solely offline, by no means connecting to the web, and made by Canadian firm Coinkite.
A firmware bug launched in March 2021 had routed key era via a weak software program random quantity generator as a substitute of the gadget’s devoted {hardware} chip. Non-public keys (the key codes that show possession of Bitcoin and authorize any transaction) grew to become guessable, with safety collapsing from 128 bits to roughly 40—the cryptographic equal of a financial institution vault that seems to have a four-digit PIN.
The onchain metrics across the Coldcard incident reinforce how vital self custody is to the resilience of Bitcoin as an asset class.
Within the couple of days across the hack:
– 2.1k $BTC was stolen
– 22k moved to exchanges
– 233k moved out of long run holder wallets in on… pic.twitter.com/iewr5RvG9c— Nick Neuman (@Nneuman) August 9, 2026
Galaxy Analysis tracked the fallout throughout three confirmed assault waves, with losses reaching roughly 1,596 $BTC throughout greater than 5,200 addresses.
Casa’s Neuman, earlier this week, posted the on-chain numbers from analyst James Verify of Checkonchain to make an argument for Bitcoin’s resilience. Self-custody, holding your individual non-public keys somewhat than leaving Bitcoin with an trade or custodian, did not buckle beneath strain however as a substitute tailored, he argued.
“The onchain metrics across the Coldcard incident reinforce how vital self-custody is to the resilience of Bitcoin as an asset class,” Neuman wrote on X.
The breakdown Neumann cited in his put up, drawing Checkonchain’s onchain knowledge: 2,100 $BTC stolen (increased than Galaxy’s personal accouting), and 22,000 $BTC moved to exchanges. And 233,000 $BTC moved out of long-term holder wallets—addresses dormant for not less than 155 days, a cohort analysts watch as a proxy for critical, affected person buyers—into security. That’s greater than 100 occasions what the attackers took.
The Coldcard incident resulted in Lengthy-Time period Holder provide declining by ~233k $BTC, a 1.38% fall from its latest all-time excessive.
With such a significant occasion, an vital query is whether or not the emergency migration of cash has skewed the onchain metrics we use to analyse Bitcoin.… pic.twitter.com/FPVLUkUlqU
— _Checkonchain (@_checkonchain) August 7, 2026
A few of that got here from Coldcard customers migrating to multisig wallets (setups requiring a number of impartial keys to approve any transaction, so no single compromised gadget can drain every thing). Some got here from holders on Ledger and Trezor—solely totally different {hardware}—who used the hack as a wake-up name.
Casa confirmed each patterns from precise buyer conversations. “So someplace between ~10x-100x the quantity of bitcoin stolen was moved to security as folks sounded the alarm,” Neuman wrote.
When a centralized trade will get breached, every thing goes directly. Right here, the attacker needed to crack addresses individually, incomes a trickle at a time whereas the remainder of the community had time to reply. “This can be a big flashing neon signal showcasing the resilience that self-custody provides to the community,” Neuman wrote. “If all that $BTC was held at a custodian and the custodian was hacked as a substitute, these numbers would have been flipped.”
Information from analytics firm Glassnode confirms the dimensions: long-term holder provide dropped from almost 15 million $BTC to roughly 14.7 million—the most important weekly decline since December 2024. It occurred whereas Bitcoin traded roughly 50% under its all-time excessive of $126,000, set in October 2025.
Coinkite has urged anybody who generated a seed on firmware variations 4.0.1 via 4.1.9—masking March 2021 to July 2026—to deal with these wallets as compromised and migrate to a brand new seed instantly.




